Two sessions to "learn" VFP? I've always told people there was a very short
5 year learning curve on VFP. But, if you only want to be able to create a
form using the wizards, maybe one session. Two sessions he says, I must be
extremely slow at catching on . . . . <VBG> (I know, go ahead and take your
best shot while my hands are down)

JH


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Kevin Cully
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 10:28 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: FoxForward 2007 - Topic Deadline Approaches

Just a reminder that there are only two weeks until the deadline of
April 15th to turn in your topic(s) for FoxForward presentations.
Unlike U.S. tax forms, our form is easy to understand!  We're open to a
wide range of topics.  If you find it interesting in the technical
realm, we probably will too.

In relation to the above, we have received a request from a potential
attendee.  He was wondering if anyone would be doing a "Learning VFP"
session(s).  I couldn't imagine that this would be able to fit into a
single session slot, and that it would probably have to be two sessions.
 It will be a challenge, I'm sure, to fit all of that content into two
sessions and get maximum impact.  Any takers?

http://foxforward.net/presentationform.php

If you have any questions, just drop me a line!

Thanks,
-Kevin
CULLY Technologies, LLC

Sponsor of FoxForward 2007
foxforward.net



[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@shelbynet.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to