Ted Roche wrote: > <snipped> > Once MS started putting silly, meaningless phrases in their license, > it was obvious they were not interested in doing business with people > who wanted to use their product. Imagine your corporate attorney > asking you "Did you work around any technical limitations in the > software in the course of developing this application?" How could you > answer? Did you make a cursor Read/Write? Did you hack an FRX to do > things the Report Writer doesn't let you do? Did you create a view > that can't be loaded in the View Designer? It's a proposterous > standard to be held to, and it makes it clear that MS thinks they can > control the minutia of how their software is used. I cannot risk > spending my time and money in court debating what the EULA means in a > court of law. If Microsoft cannot write a license I can clearly > understand and agree to, I cannot in good conscience use their > product. Time to move on. >
Good points as usual....thanks, TR! -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
