On Tuesday 10 April 2007 4:55 pm, Derek Kalweit wrote: > > I think we're saying the same thing in different ways. > > > > The financial and governmental advantages and responsibilities of civil > > "marriage" should be available to all who choose to pair up to help get > > through life and (if desired) rear children. > > Not really-- I believe the government should not in any way respect > 'marriage' by any definition. There should be absolutely no benefits > given simply for the purpose of people getting 'married'. This is > wrong, and condoning a religious practice(Roman Catholic sacrament of > Matrimony). > > For practical reasons, contracts should be more common place between > individuals(any number and sex) to allow each other power of attorney,
Hi Derek! Well, why stop there? Why don't you tell all those nice pedophiles that the little boys really love them and all the crying and saying it hurts is just playing hard to get? It is pure religion to prohibit man/boy sodomy, straight from the bible. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
