Andy Davies wrote: >> the M$ response about having to rewrite for 64-bit technology... >> > > yes, this has always been the response from Ken Levy (and others), but I'm > not completely convinced by it:- > > 1) they did it for 16 to 32 bit >
They rewrote it in toto going from FoxPro for Windows to VFP3 , which is exactly what they said they'd have to do to get a 64-bit one now. And they're not prepared to do that. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
