> > Why not just install xp over it? Less hassle. > If it is a high enough version of Vista, M$'s answer to folks at a roll-out session was to use Virtual PC 2007 with XP. I have done that with one PC, and it seems to be working well, although it is hogging a lot of RAM for Vista, leaving less than 1Gb for the XP Guest OS.
Gil > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ricardo Araoz > Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2007 12:04 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: VFP 6/8 on Vista > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Ajoy Khaund > > Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 10:17 PM > > To: Profox > > Subject: VFP 6/8 on Vista > > > > Hi All, > > > > Has anyone successfully loaded VFP6 or VFP 8 on a Vista Machine > and compiled a > > EXE. > > > > I need to buy a laptop and all are available with Vista mostly. > There are some > > old apps which I just dont want to redo but still need to make > minor changes now > > and then. Will I be able to do that on a Vista machine. > > > > TIA > > > > Ajoy Khaund > > > > Why not just install xp over it? Less hassle. > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
