Richard Kaye wrote: > As an alternative to SET STEP ON, I would suggest ASSERT .f. That way, > if you forget to remove it later, it has no impact in an EXE. > Since he's using VFP9, it wouldn't have any impact for your end-user (since VFP7, iirc), right?
I agree with you though, as ASSERTs allow you to bypass stopping/stepping sometimes, and are effective in situations where events like Activate or GotFocus cause issues when trying to debug (because they keep firing when you switch to/from the debug window). -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
