Leland ol' pal: On Apr 27, 2007, at 12:35 AM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
> Its good to have you back Bob, and to see you haven't lost a step > while > away. You're fully up to speed already, and its just your first > week back. Life throws a lot of curves. Adaptability is the key. :) > > I enjoyed listening to the link you provided, (eg I never got the > video > to work), about the previous Democratic Administration's belief that > Saddam had WMD, and I couldn't help but chuckle a little wondering if > you are still looking for them. I found them. They are in charge of Congress now. :( > > Now you're tell me, and the Scientific community form 113 countries > around the world, who just completed a 6 year study of global warming > and climate change, that global warming is just a figment of our > imagination, even though the esteem pannel of Scientist have > statistically place a 90% probability that humans are responsible for > global warming and climate change. No, I'm saying the inference that CO2 is the cause is what requires a lot of make-believe to accept. It's sooner a symptom than the cause. And it sure as hell isn't a 'pollutant'. Science indeed! Furthermore the argument man can fix it by focusing on CO2 borders on lunacy. First clue should be this: anything Al Gore promotes is by definition a pig-in-a-poke. (NAFTA included... and carbon offsets! Oh my Lord what a fraud! It's the modern secular equivalent to the Catholic Church's medieval practice of indulgences.) The man hasn't made an honest argument in his life. That's quite an achievement---even for a politician. > > I've learned that trying to reason with you on issue you have made up > your mind about is like beating my head against a brick wall. I've learned that you should probably stop abusing the wall that way. It isn't helping your arguments either. ;) > Trying to > change people who are in denial is funny that way. Welcome back, > and I > look forward to some stimulating debates with you as the 2008 > elections > draw near. Aye, and likewise. :) - Bob > > Regards, > > LelandJ > > > On 04/26/2007 Robert Calco wrote: >> Leland's capacity for ratiocination is startling even for an >> accountant. I simply don't run into such high quality specimens of >> non sequiturs and false inference, not to mention absurdity, even in >> all the daily 'team meetings' I endure in IT (there naturally the >> issue is quantity, not quality). > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
