In all seriousness, that half our population has forgotten --  
literally forgotten -- our collective complicity in debating whether  
to invade Iraq not once, but twice, and accepting the argument of pre- 
emption (not "immanent threat" as some like to recast the past) as  
sufficient grounds to do what we did on a large BIPARTISAN basis  
means we're about due for another reminder what that was all about.

Sad, but it's on its way. Get ready.

- Bob

On Apr 27, 2007, at 12:04 AM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:

> What war?  The war on terrorism is not really a war that should  
> qualify
> the president to claim war time powers, any more that the war on  
> drug is
> a real war, or the war on poverty, etc.
>
> Regards,
>
> LelandJ
>
> Pete Theisen wrote:
>> On Thursday 26 April 2007 10:33 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
>>
>>> I don't think its legal to overthrow the US Constitutional form of
>>> government by any means, if its against the wishes of the American
>>> people.  As Bill Arnold would say, the American people have and are
>>> being duped.  Overthrow of the American government by other mean  
>>> such as
>>> treachery and deceit should also be illegal.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Leland!
>>
>> You are wrong. The constitution itself provides an amendment  
>> process, Article
>> V.
>>
>> The current whining, however, is over the administration's use of the
>> president's war powers. They never say anything when a D president  
>> uses the
>> same power.
>>
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to