Incidentally the degree to which Democrats have managed to transfer their collective neuroses entirely to one person -- the person of George W. Bush -- is truly a mass-psychological phenomenon. It eclipses even the good ol' days of Clinton bashing, which I fondly recall. I mean, I never hated the man to the core of my being, like these people hate Dubya, I just found him absurd and embarrassing. Hell I find Bush absurd and embarrassing, especially when attempting to speak off the cuff on camera, but I don't think he's either stupid or evil. And I never meditated on his potential assassination or wished America would lose in Kosivo over my beliefs about his character.
Someone supposedly so stupid and so evil duped so many people who consider themselves so smart and so righteous---how do they look themselves in the mirror, I wonder? Hate and lust for power ooze out of everything Reid says and Pelosi does. (Seriously---she'll go across the world to visit Bashir Assad, and offer idly to visit with Adolf Amadinutjob---but doesn't have time to meet General Patraeus before a vote basically telling him he's full of sh*t?) - Bob On Apr 27, 2007, at 12:08 AM, Michael Madigan wrote: > When the Islamofascists celebrated the Democratic > Victory in November, you know the Bush administration > did the right thing in invading Iraq. > > > > --- Robert Calco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> In all seriousness, that half our population has >> forgotten -- >> literally forgotten -- our collective complicity in >> debating whether >> to invade Iraq not once, but twice, and accepting >> the argument of pre- >> emption (not "immanent threat" as some like to >> recast the past) as >> sufficient grounds to do what we did on a large >> BIPARTISAN basis >> means we're about due for another reminder what that >> was all about. >> >> Sad, but it's on its way. Get ready. >> >> - Bob >> >> On Apr 27, 2007, at 12:04 AM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA >> wrote: >> >>> What war? The war on terrorism is not really a >> war that should >>> qualify >>> the president to claim war time powers, any more >> that the war on >>> drug is >>> a real war, or the war on poverty, etc. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> LelandJ >>> >>> Pete Theisen wrote: >>>> On Thursday 26 April 2007 10:33 pm, Leland F. >> Jackson, CPA wrote: >>>> >>>>> I don't think its legal to overthrow the US >> Constitutional form of >>>>> government by any means, if its against the >> wishes of the American >>>>> people. As Bill Arnold would say, the American >> people have and are >>>>> being duped. Overthrow of the American >> government by other mean >>>>> such as >>>>> treachery and deceit should also be illegal. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Leland! >>>> >>>> You are wrong. The constitution itself provides >> an amendment >>>> process, Article >>>> V. >>>> >>>> The current whining, however, is over the >> administration's use of the >>>> president's war powers. They never say anything >> when a D president >>>> uses the >>>> same power. >>>> >>> >>> >>> [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
