If that doesn't involve shutting down industry while we wait for a cleaner solution.
Global Warming is all about moving the third-world into the first-world, not about preventing a global meltdown. I agree with you that we should be moving towards wind, solar and other environmentally-friendly solutions, but not by the threat of junk science. CO2 is an insignificant greenhouse gas compared to water vapor, so perhaps we should limit water-vapor emissions. Humans are a source of methane, so perhaps we should start killing off a third of the population, provided that the carcases don't rot and add to the greenhouse gasses already in the atmosphere. > If we move to more environmentally friendly energy, > and it turns out > not to matter climatologically, what (besides the > oil industry) does > it hurt? > > -Jerry Wolper > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: [email protected] > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: > http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/%(messageid)s > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, > are the opinions of the author, and do not > constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are > too stupid to see the obvious. > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
