john harvey wrote: > I had trouble using AMD chips on NT Servers years ago, but they work fine > today. I usually go for the cheaper offering, because their performance is > about the same. This strategerie allows me to continue to fund my wife and > kids excellent adventures, and after all, that is what it's all about, ain't > it!
There you go! Once she has a new box, then the kids will get another box that will be more video and media-ready..... There just wasn't any way to get the kids the machine they NEED without getting her the one she WANTS (but doesn't need /smirk/). Of course, I might get 'something' out of the deal, too, as it's going to be a surprise... one day she'll boot up her machine and, well, gosh, this sure seems faster than it was yesterday! Whil _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
