> If you were given an alpha-emitting cookie, a beta-emitting cookie and > a gamma-emitting cookie and told you had to eat one, put one in your > pocket, and throw one away, would you know the right answer? (Without > googling?)
No. And that's why we have the FCC, the World Health Organization, and many other authorities on these subjects to protect us. All of these agencies tell us WiFi is not a major concern, and in fact the evidence through research shows it very trivial-- this article alone states, 600 times below the threshold! I'm not one for blindly trusting government, their respective agencies, etc., but I really hate to see the public attention taken away from things that do matter for trivial things simply in the name of ratings, as this seems to be... "Wifi? oh-- I have that, maybe I should watch!" Just my 2 cents... -- Derek _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
