Richard Kaye wrote: > That's a bird of a different feather... <g> How about wrapping that > TABLEUPDATE in a transaction, too? > Yep....good idea...but as of this AM, I rewrote it to simply SCAN the view for the dirty buffer records, did a SEEK to find the matching record in the table, then did a GATHER to collect the changes.....all (now) wrapped in a transaction. Not sure why I didn't wrap it in a transaction anyway years ago, but its a moot point now.
-- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
