> Are they re-writing their VB6 (dead longer than VFP!) app in DotNyet?
They were bought out by another company who killed that app off (still supports older users, kind of). Replaced the app with an Oracle solution. I have not had to deal with that interface as my client likes the stability I brought to bear with the previous version. Fine with me. Gil > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of MB Software Solutions > Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 1:05 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: MySQL ODBC > > > mrgmhale wrote: > > Bastards indeed! After they "fixed" their interface they told my client > > (who knows me well, and has seen me lock horns with others in > the past with > > technical issues where I have found defects/problems) they only altered > > their app because I was being so uncooperative, and I never > should have used > > an outdated language ("total solution"? <g>) as Visual FoxPro > since it was > > dead, and VB6 was the ideal language to use for any serious > development.... > > Hmmm... Their app locks up (even now) every few weeks, and needs to be > > restarted, and their Access table based searches are slow. My stuff VFP > > runs fast, and is up 24 x 7, never locked up, not once ever > (Windows 2000 > > SP4). > > > And your client knows the *truth* then, right? It'd be great if he > called them on it, just as you noted above. > > > When one of their installers was on site during all this controversy he > > needed to do a conversion on his Access tables. He began to run his VB6 > > conversion against the Access affected table (over 400,000 > records), and it > > was poking along real slow. I asked him to kill his update > process and let > > me perform the conversion using VFP on an updateable view via ODBC. He > > scoffed, so I told him the worst he could do is learn > something, or better > > yet he could torment me about my outdated VFP app if it did not > run faster > > than VB6. He agreed, and I wrote a simple STRTRAN('<string>', > '-', '*') for > > .t. piece of code, followed with tableupdate() of course. Wow! > Even I was > > shocked at the performance difference! Pow! It went so fast > that he then > > scanned every record in VB6 to make certain the data had actually been > > changed without defect. He was impressed, but did not want to tell his > > Support Techs on the phone that VFP just kicked their asses in > performance, > > as he thought he could lose his job for being uncooperative <g>... > > > I love real world stories like this! I wish there was a site dedicated > only to bringing these kinds of stories to light!!! > > > Super-Bastards! > > > > Are they re-writing their VB6 (dead longer than VFP!) app in DotNyet? > > -- > Michael J. Babcock, MCP > MB Software Solutions, LLC > http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com > http://fabmate.com > "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
