Bill Anderson wrote: > ...and from what I understand, the companies didn't have to pay a cent > for the development of these applications. Apparently, they got their > money's worth <g>. > lol! Would they have spent the money that normally would have been required to write those applications? I'll bet that whatever money was spent on it, they could have saved money having it written in VFP (assuming it could have been) since it required much much more development time to do something in DotNot 1.0 that you could have done much much easier in VFP. <g>
> One of the all-time great quotes from a MSFT marketer at LA Fox re: .NET > 1.0 -- "Companies are throwing out their mission critical applications > sight unseen to rewrite them in the beta version of .NET [1.0]." > That's absolutely absurd! Talk about fools drinking the kool-aid! What a freakin' idiot. He was paid to say crap like that...regardless of how ludicrous it was. -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
