> I'll bet that whatever money was > spent on it, they could have saved money having it written in VFP > (assuming it could have been) since it required much much more > development time to do something in DotNot 1.0 that you could have done > much much easier in VFP. <g>
Who says it would take more time in .NET 1.0 than VFP? I guarantee for many developers, it would be FAR faster to do most things in .NET versus VFP-- learning VFP code syntax, idealogy, and then the years of learning how to work around the 'quirks'(bugs) in VFP to keep it from crashing? Give me .NET for new projects, please. -- Derek _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
