> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Michael Hawksworth > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 12:53 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Source Safe Question > > Why not use the SS integration into VFP? If you don't mind me asking. > > Regards > Michael Hawksworth >
Michael: I have several applications with custom procedures, forms, reports, etc. I also have a core of the same things that makes up about 80% of each application. It is easier for me to have each folder as a separate project in SourceSafe. I wrote a procedure to look through the \libs, \reports, \data (for the dbc), \forms, etc.; and if any of the text is checked out, I recreate it with scctext (that came with SourceSafe) and then check the file in. This works for me because of my many projects and I would rather spend my time developing applications rather than learning how to share files using SourceSafe. Jeff Jeff Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 623-582-0323 Fax 623-869-0675 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/signed text/plain (text body -- kept) application/x-pkcs7-signature --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
