How can you convict a man of obstruction, when no crime was committed?
--- Kristyne McDaniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > John, > > > Yeah, I just think the whole case was a sham. He > was guilty > > of forgetting at > > the least. If they want to go after people, they > should start > > with the > > legislators! > > I don't think the case was a sham. I think he is > guilty of obstruction, just > as the court found. I'm just saying that the > president has the power to > commute his sentence and there is no reason for me > to get worked up about > something we all knew was going to happen. > > Kristyne McDaniel > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: [email protected] > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: > http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, > are the opinions of the author, and do not > constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are > too stupid to see the obvious. > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
