Ah but weren't OTLTs great when we had only 2 (yes, TWO) work areas to play in ?
Paul Newton Mike yearwood wrote: >> Message: 5 >> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 08:43:04 -0500 (CDT) >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: [NF] Consulting saga continued or Why Be Normal? >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> >> >> Well I have a configuration tool designed for generating data for our >> sales screen. I was told that our DBA will not allow a single table for >> lookups. Instead I now need 5 tables to hold identical data. >> Key, Description, status, ChangeDate, LastUser >> > > No offense intended. > > http://www.dbazine.com/ofinterest/oi-articles/celko22 > > Exactly how are Mr., Mrs., Dr. - salutations the same as UPS, FEDX, > MAIL - delivery options? They have a common structure. I think you > might want to reconsider "normalization". That they have a code and a > description is not the perspective to use. What they are is what > decides where they belong, not the data structure. > > When does the OTLT break? When there is a Salutation entry for "Dr.", > "Doctor" and another set of records indicating Employee types, "Dr.", > "Doctor". Despite having a separate Type field, the fact remains there > are now 2 records for "Doctor" in this table, which is AFAIK against > the concept of normalization. > > Mike > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
