> What a ripoff.
>

Not really, cuz the $750 gets you 5 User or Machine TS licenses for 2003
Server <g>...  Only $150 per license!  What a deal, eh?

There are some exclusions to the TS license.  For instance, I do not know if
RD is considered to be a "real TS" session, and it does not include IE
browsers that hit the 2003 Server.  I think it is time for me to try to
locate the links I had found on this subject from when I first got whacked
with this issue.

Here you go, for your reading pleasure!

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/howtobuy/licensing/ts2003.mspx


Gil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ted Roche
> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 9:38 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [NF] Terminal services problem
>
>
> On 8/3/07, mrgmhale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Are you, by chance, hitting a Windows 2003 Server using TS (as
> opposed to
> > Remote Desktop)?  If so, then you are in for an expensive
> surprise.  With
> > Server 2003, unlike Server 2000 and NT4 Server, TS is no longer
> offered as
> > part of the Server OS on a No Additional Charge basis.
>
> Ow! So, remote administrative support (not fo running apps remotely,
> which is TS and might require a license, but for maintaining the
> server) you have to shell out $750 for a TS license? What a ripoff.
>
> --
> Ted Roche
> Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
> http://www.tedroche.com
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to