>> 4. Windows Vista's hardware requirements, while not mind-bogglingly >> high, are fairly demanding, especially in the Memory department. While >> it can be argued, and arguments can be made both ways, that it may not >> be the best implementation - it is still a design implementation to plan > > By indirectly forcing everyone to upgrade to latest hardware, Vi$ta > created a ecological disaster. Many parts would be discarded and who's > gonna recycling them? >
And could we dumb old hardware into the backyard of Micro$oft HQ? Which country wanna have a large landfill? -- @~@ http://changmw.homeip.net / v \ May the Force and Farce be with you! Linux 2.6.22.1 /( _ )\ (Xubuntu 7.04) 14:11:01 up 3 days 4:03 ^ ^ 1 user load average: 0.03 0.03 0.00 news://news.3home.net news://news.hkpcug.org news://news.newsgroup.com.hk _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
