Ed Leafe <> wrote:
> On Aug 11, 2007, at 10:51 AM, Paul Hill wrote:
>
>> In all, it's a worthwhile error to catch for the US data, but it
>> doesn't change much about the overall pattern.
>
> That doesn't matter. If there is any tiny error that can be focused
> on to the exclusion of everything else to the contrary, that is
> enough for the anti-science folks to grab on to and use to justify
> ignorance. I mean, how stupid do you have to be to not notice the
> word "global" in "global warming" and constantly harp about local
> temperatures?
Are you calling our version of Beavis stupid?
Stephen Russell
DBA / .Net Developer
Memphis TN 38115
901.246-0159
"A good way to judge people is by observing how they treat those who
can do them absolutely no good." ---Unknown
http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.13/946 - Release Date: 8/10/2007
3:50 PM
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
