>> In all, it's a worthwhile error to catch for the US data, but it >> doesn't change much about the overall pattern. > >That doesn't matter. If there is any tiny error that can be focused >on to the exclusion of everything else to the contrary, that is >enough for the anti-science folks to grab on to and use to justify >ignorance. I mean, how stupid do you have to be to not notice the >word "global" in "global warming" and constantly harp about local >temperatures?
Ah... but local is part of global... at least in my local part of the globe... and hence, cannot be ignored. Beyond that can we only say something is science if it yields the results we are wanting it to yield? It's sort of like the lefties claiming a monopoly on compassion by defining it according to their Robin Hood complex. Larry Miller --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
