Mark Stanton wrote: > <snipped> > You, Michael, & Steve have all talked about implementing something better > via SQL, the VFP views are really SQL, so it looks like it's "just" a > not-very-good implementation issue? > > D'you think something clever here will extend the Fox's life? 8-) > I think it's a matter of versatility/flexibility. By using such a design as we've mentioned, you're not as limited as if you (at the end of the extreme) used Fox tables directly via the DataEnvironment. That, imo, is about as flexible as concrete.
-- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
