Paul Newton wrote: > Ted Roche wrote: > >> I hope not. The more work I do outside the Fox world, the more dated I >> see some of FoxPro's designs. >> > Ted, I'd be very interested if you were to elaborate on that a little. > Some examples, maybe ? >
I too would enjoy hearing what's outdated from VFP. I'm sure there's plenty, but nonetheless, I'd enjoy hearing from one such as TR (whom has tons of respect for his knowledge and contributions over the years) has to say about what's better outside of VFP. I recall another gentleman (not here) telling me how DotNet handled strings (or something else?? can't recall at present) much better than VFP. -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
