I should have mentioned that self hosted may be an option. Does that make FoxWeb more attractive and if so why?
TIA George On 9/15/07, Rick Schummer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I thought the concern with all of these Fox web tools is that most ISPs > did NOT support these...i.e., they didn't allow the Fox runtimes on > their servers and hence made this pretty much a bad choice if you had to > have someone else host it.<< > > As Ed said, this was not mentioned. There are many options available for > developers who want to get > a VFP Web server assembled. Sure you have to avoid most commercial hosting > canned options, but it > can be done, and really is not hard to do. If the end customer has a > requirement to host this for > $20 a month then it might be tougher. Self hosting is pretty simple. > > Rick > White Light Computing, Inc. > > www.whitelightcomputing.com > www.swfox.net > www.rickschummer.com > > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
