Paul McNett wrote: > MB Software Solutions wrote: >> Rick Schummer wrote: >>> All three major VFP Web frameworks require a host that will allow VFP DLLs >>> and runtime files. It is >>> not a common configuration with commercial hosting. The difference between >>> the three are not in the >>> hosting environment. The difference is in features, ease of configuration, >>> technical support, and >>> community. >>> >> These days, I wonder why ISPs would oppose the VFP DLLs and runtime >> files being placed on their servers, as they're not overly huge in size. ?? > > Don't most cookie-cutter web hosting operations use Linux as their OS, > not Windows?
A lot of ISPs will also offer Windows + Front Page + .ASP boxes. The ones I've seen usually cost more for the same throughput/capacity. Probably for the added security. Whil _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
