On Sep 19, 2007, at 5:39 PM, Vince Teachout wrote:
> I disagree only with your (implied) first e-mail, which made it
> sound as
> if you felt this was an example of free speech being quashed. I don't
> believe it was.
It was simply the use of force when force was not necessary, as if
to send a message. Now what do you call it when people change their
behavior because of the threat of attack?
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
