On Oct 26, 2007, at 8:47 PM, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
> Ok. Then I guess it is option "a" (I'm in the idiot's list) and
> what you
> objected to is option "c", so what's the problem?
I didn't "object"; in fact, I agreed with you by saying "of course".
People are free to make idiots of themselves; I was adding a remark
about the other side of that freedom coin. Why does that make you
feel like I was objecting?
> BTW, have you noticed you just entered the group of those who argue
> with
> the "[OT] idiots"? How ironic.
Argue? Agreeing with you, and then saying something in the exact
same spirit is arguing?
Wow.
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
