Ed Leafe wrote: > On Oct 26, 2007, at 8:47 PM, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: > >> Ok. Then I guess it is option "a" (I'm in the idiot's list) and >> what you >> objected to is option "c", so what's the problem? > > I didn't "object"; in fact, I agreed with you by saying "of course". > People are free to make idiots of themselves; I was adding a remark > about the other side of that freedom coin. Why does that make you > feel like I was objecting? > >> BTW, have you noticed you just entered the group of those who argue >> with >> the "[OT] idiots"? How ironic. > > Argue? Agreeing with you, and then saying something in the exact > same spirit is arguing? > > Wow. >
Ok! Ok! Ok! I give up! It's true! I just misconstrued your whole post. And I thought I was fluent in english! Back to school.... sigh.... _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
