On 10/29/07, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>         I believe (correct me if I'm wrong, Garrett) that the primary
> difference would be a wiki without the threat of unilateral
> censorship. As I said in my previous message, I just don't think that
> there are enough people who give a damn about that.

That was the primary impetus in creating it, but as I listed in my
last post, there are other reasons.

Another one would be templates, such as infoboxes: we could create one
for language articles that showed at a glance whether something was a
function, property, or method; what version it came into the language;
what version it was deprecated; and so forth.


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to