Ken Dibble wrote:

>>Why not check the running processes for your executable, combined with
>>the window title search? Your program would have all the info it needs
>>to make a "smart" decision, keeping the user from losing hair.
> 
> I've never seen an example of code that could find a running process and 
> terminate it without relying on the window title search. I have tried very 
> hard to find one. Is there such a beast? Can you point me to a URL or 
> something? I'd be much obliged.


I don't know about specific code, however on the WinXP commandline there 
are 2 applications available that would provide the basic ingredients:

tasklist (known as tlist prior to xp)
kill

You could parse the output of tasklist, calling kill on the process(es) 
you've identified.

There are also the windows api functions which I'm too lazy to look up 
right now.


> At least in my field, which is mostly about providing social services, and 
> only marginally about computer operation, and where it is impossible to 
> enforce any minimum computer literacy requirements in job descriptions even 
> if we put them in there, it's better not to give users opportunities to 
> confuse themselves.

I hear you. I remember what it was like when users weren't so skilled as 
they are these days in the corporate world.


-- 
pkm ~ http://paulmcnett.com


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to