Yes, I would have been in favor of a preemptive strike against Japan. If we would have done that, we wouldn't have had to nuke them later.
--- MB Software Solutions General Account <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael Madigan wrote: > > I believe that's what they said before Pearl > Harbor, > > too. > > > > > > > > So you would have been in favor of a pre-emptive > strike against the > Empire of Japan? I don't think some things can be > stopped...like pearl > harbor....other than by intercepting > intelligence...which is kinda what > I said...better the intelligence and fortify the > borders. > > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: [email protected] > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: > http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, > are the opinions of the author, and do not > constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are > too stupid to see the obvious. > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
