>This would be Paul's ... letter? (epistle - 'epístola' in spanish) to
>the Romans. It is not old testament, nor Christ's word, so I guess it
>would carry the same weight that a document by the current Pope, who
>could be absolutely wrong because he is not talking about doctrine.
>So it would be just opinion. Wouldn't it?
Wrong Wricardo!
I guess they didn't teach you about the scriptural canon and the doctrines of
inspiration, preservation and the like. Beyond that, if you profess to be a
Catholic, making the claim that the Pope could be wrong, particularly when he
is speaking from the chair, throws that claim into question. If you can show
your study of the scripture has the same depth and breadth as the Pope, I would
then entertain your contention that the Pope is wrong.
Now then, if you are going to say that you are capable of knowing which parts
of the Bible can be believed and which parts cannot, with that less than
adequate study, I would say you are on shaky ground. You may have thrown out
the wrong parts.
--
Larry Miller
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/mixed
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
message/rfc822
---
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
