Ed Leafe >It isn't about sheer numbers; it's about the overall security >design. Example: people were surprised when news of a trojan that >attacked OS X machines was reported earlier this year. Windows >fanbois were falling over themselves to loudly trumpet that OS X was >just as vulnerable as Windows. Of course, it turned out that the only >way someone could get attacked was to deliberately launch an unknown >executable program, and then enter their admin password when >prompted. That's hardly what I would call insecure.
Could it be this you are talking about http://www.itnews.com.au/News/64163,phishing-trojan-targets-mac-os-x.aspx Not some obscure exe requiring a admin password but a download this codec to get free porn malware. You know the same thing that Windows has been vilified for. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
