On Dec 11, 2007 10:15 AM, David Crooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> You forgot a buzzword: AJAX  8-)
>

Well, I really wanted to try to avoid that slippery slope, and went
for the more inclusive  HTML/CSS/JavaScript/XML, because 95% of what I
see people selling as "AJAX" is neither Asynchronous not XML-ish, but
just the same old Dynamic HTML with Javascript demos that Ken Levy was
showing us in 1998. Some folks have really gotten the religion and are
using the latest techniques to make really rich-interaction web sites
with AJAX, (which requires a serious re-architecting of the
server-side) but most really still seem to be the old modal
post-and-retrieve model, (with a Javascript library pasted into the
HTML for dancing widgets), which actually makes a lot of sense when
you're talking about "transactions" and not twitters. I think that
both "modes" have their place: whether or not the item is in stock is
a handy piece of information for the user to see (and update on the
fly), but the order doesn't go through until the "Place My Order"
button is pressed.

A number of clients are still using the post-and-retrieve model for
heads-down transactions and have no problem with that. I wasn't so
much concerned with the mode of user interaction as the choice of
tools involved. While I understand the move to develop apps in
Flash/Silverlight/etc. as an attempt at getting a richer UI with
simpler scripting, I see it as a step backwards towards the "One Tool
To Rule Them All"  model of vendor-customer relations.

Using a freely-shared Javascript library like Prototype[1]  lets you
get all the AJAXy goodness without tying you down to a specific
implementation for the server-side scripting language (Ruby, Python,
PHP, Perl or DotNet) or platform (Apache or IIS, FreeBSD, Linux, OS X
or Windows). I think that's a bigger win for the developers: they can
change the underlying fraemwork without changing the UI or vice versa.
Isn't that what all this n-tier stuff is supposed to be about?

[1] http://www.prototypejs.org/

---
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to