On Thursday, December 13, 2007 12:48 PM Michael wrote:

>Wow...where have I been...I still thought it was bad for us!  When was that 
>disproved? 

Give me the real stuff any day...

>From http://www.soveriegn.freeservers.com/fda.htm for what it is worth:
"No single Man-food substance had been tested more than saccarin. Its inventors 
had been very careful lest they market something dangerous. It had also been on 
the market a very long time without serious problems. The "experiment" that 
started the cancer scare should not even be graced with the honor of that 
title. It involved only 12 rats. There was no control group. Saccarin was 
surgically implanted in the bladders of all 12 rats. Half of the rats developed 
cancer. Even something as innocuous as honey can cause cancer if surgically 
implanted in the bladder. This "experiment" was then proclaimed by the FDA as 
"proof" that saccarin causes cancer, without any other clinical or experimental 
data. The FDA did not specifically demand that Saccarin be taken off the 
market. If they had, they would have faced lawsuits, and lost. It was more 
effective to simply issue their statement. The vendors then had to either 
replace the saccarin in their foods and drinks, or lose business.

Not long after, the FDA approved Aspartame under suspicious circumstances. This 
is a chemical that breaks down into aspartic acid, phelylalanine and methanol, 
which in turn produces formaldehyde, at temperatures above 85° Fahrenheit. 
These are very toxic chemicals." 

David L. Crooks



_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to