On Dec 13, 2007, at 12:48 PM, MB Software Solutions General Account
wrote:
> Wow...where have I been...I still thought it was bad for us! When was
> that disproved?
It was never "proven". What happened was that the sugar
manufacturers produced some self-funded experiments that were
criticized at the time by serious scientists. They targeted
cyclamates first, and then saccharin. Since the legislators enjoyed
fat juicy campaign contributions from the sugar industry, they banned
cyclamates and required warning labels on saccharin.
It is still bad for you, but then again, so is sugar. It just isn't
the poison that industry-funded "research" claimed it was.
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
