Nope - Copy-Modify-Merge model won't work. You really don't want to merge two binary files, aren't you?
If you guys need someone to set that thing up, I can help you in this matter. I would also suggest using Subversion + Tortoise instead pure CVS (Subversion is CVS-based, does the same thing and IMO is better) and Tortoise integrates in windows shell. Just right click the folder and "commit". ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Newton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 3:23 PM Subject: Re: CVS and visual classes > Grigore > > Thanks for your reply but .... > > Grigore Dolghin wrote: >> There are two models: Lock-Modify-Unlock and Copy-Modify-Merge. Both have >> their strengths and weaknesses. >> >> I would suggest for you to use Lock-Modify-Unlock model, but this means >> only >> one developer makes changes at a time. To keep productivity, your >> classlibs >> should be small and containing fewer classes, to minimize the chances you >> both need to open the same classlib. > The problem is that the classlib is large and contains all the classes > we need - I agree Lock-Modify-Unlock would be best but this is exactly > the reason that I started this thread ... CVS (or Subversion ?) will > lock the whole VCX if I want to work on one class he won't be able to > work on any other class in the same VCX. > > Because of the way he has set up everything in one humongous VCX, I > really I see this as a can or worms ... > > That would only leave us with Copy-Modify-Merge as an option ... and I'm > not sure if there wouldn't be problems with that approach as well > > Paul Newton > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
