A line item that's been vetoed, if it's really worthwhile, will have enough votes to override The president.
--- Vince Teachout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stephen Russell wrote: > > We will never see this coming form the scum that > is pilling up spending for > > any sort of reason. > > > There are other reasons beside that. We're not ALL > scum! :-) > > But I want to see a line item veto for the > President. Giving them the > > ability to reduce POOR bill amendments that just > cost us $$$. > I never want to see a line item veto. It gives a > POOR president too > much power. If you don't agree, or don't > understand, just think back to > the last President you DID NOT like, and ask > yourself if you would want > that President to have a LIV. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: [email protected] > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: > http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, > are the opinions of the author, and do not > constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are > too stupid to see the obvious. > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
