Thank you for the clarification. In my case it is the distribution part that would still nail me.
Gil -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed Leafe Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 6:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [NF] Sun acquires MySQL On Jan 16, 2008, at 5:36 PM, Gil Hale wrote: > If you use MySQL commercially for profit, and place > your solution code that uses MySQL into the public domain, no > license fee. > If you do not put your code into the public domain then their is an > annual > license fee to be paid. That is not correct. If you *distribute* MySQL solutions, whether you charge for them or not, you need a commercial license. If you simply use it in-house without ever distributing it, you do not need the commercial license. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
