On Jan 17, 2008 9:12 AM, Gil Hale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > M$ is getting a better handle on security would you agree? Do you > consider > > this important for your own equipment as well as your clients? > > Not "better", because "better than what? Their own crappy (in)security > issues from the past? As I see it their security problems are "less bad" > than in the past, but poorly implemented from what I have experienced with > Vista. I do feel security is important, and with the remaining security > issues, or aggravating impediments with the UAC interface popping into > action at nearly every turn until turned off, their implementation of > "better/less bad security" shows what it really is - M$ security is just > another bolt-on effort as opposed to a core feature designed within the > underpinnings of a secure OS. >
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Are you currently logged in as an administrator? They can improve the security but if you fail to follow the rules does it matter? You then complain about their in-security? > > -- > Stephen Russell > Sr. Production Systems Programmer > Mimeo.com > Memphis TN > > 901.246-0159 > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
