On reconsideration, I would agree that that's the point of twit-filters. I admit that back then, I didn't have rules set up. Today, I do. So I would concede that yes, with the help of filters, any list could survive, provided that members are smart enough to not get pulled into crappy discussions that do nothing more than waste time and don't contribute anything positive towards their day.
--Michael Allen wrote: > Im not sure I agree. After all there are twit filters. Not that I use them, > tempting sometimes though it is. > Allen > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of MB Software Solutions > > And this list survived as a result. He was persona non grata. Had he > stayed, many would have left and this list would have died long ago. > NFW would it have survived with his continual arguments. I can tolerate > Bill Arnold or anyone else, and it's so easy: I just either don't read [OT] > or add a filter. For example, I have no problems with some folks anymore > (not naming names) because I never get any email from them......thank God > for email filters!!! > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.19/1257 - Release Date: 03/02/2008 > 17:49 > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
