Paul McNett wrote: > VFP's SPT cursors can't deal with being disconnected. They need to know > they can communicate back to the server over the same handles it used > before. This is a miserable failing of VFP, another case where they got > something mostly right, but didn't bring it the last mile and gave us no > way around it, except for reimplementing everything that SPT cursors > bring to the table ourselves. > > The timer is the best compromise. >
I use a separate updatable cursor to update, so this shouldn't bite me. When I go to update, I get the records via Primary Key and then do a GATHER into that record and update it from the dirty cursor. -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
