MB Software Solutions wrote: > Because I don't like the idea of open/close/open/close/open/close for > every stinking SQL. Doesn't it have some sort of connection caching/pooling scheme like SQL Server, where even though you might tell it to close a connection or it might time out, it doesn't actually close it?
_______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
