Kristyne McDaniel wrote: > I have seen problems with legacy code using the hard-coded alias names > myself. Back in the days when there really were only 10 work areas and you > had to juggle them, that was one thing. But now when the number of available > work areas is huge it makes no sense to try to be lazy and type single > letter alias names. > > Getting rid of the single letter alias in all legacy code is a worthwhile > venture. The more of those old practices we kill off the more reliable the > old code remains. > >
That's been my experience as well. -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
