On Friday 08 February 2008 16:18, Nicholas Geti wrote: > You need some self-confidence. I didn't say you were sneaky and my general > thread was to mention that to prove whether prayer works you need to do a > double-blind study (which means using a control group). I am calling anyone > who uses circular logic and hides it in superfluous, flowery double-talk is > sneaky.
Hi Nicholas! So the "bunch" doesn't include me - is this what you are saying? You at least understand why you could never assemble a control group? > >> > Nope. You would have to have a control group that didn't pray AND had > >> > no one praying for them. Can't happen - people are even praying for Ed! > >> > >> That's the problem with religious people. They have an amazing ability > >> to come up with logical (but circular) reasons why certain things won't > >> work. > >> A very sneaky bunch. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
