On Feb 28, 2008, at 7:32 PM, Kristyne McDaniel wrote:
> Again, not one substantive reason for your preference.
Of course not, since you've already determined that Obama is an empty
suit with no redeeming qualities, and many to be despised.
Unlike you, I like *both* of them, and I would be happy to have
either in the White House. Actually, I liked Edwards the best, and
both Obama and Clinton were my fallback choices. But given the choice
now of Obama or Clinton, I prefer Obama. I don't believe that
experience and inside connections are what this country needs now.
Obama has the support of more than enough people with such connections
that I have no doubt that he won't be hopelessly lost in the White
House, as you and others seem to imply. With Hillary I believe that we
will have 4 or 8 more years of that whole red state-blue state crap,
with the polarization becoming even more extreme. There's no guarantee
that Obama can change that, but at least I believe that there is a
chance that his election may at least start the country moving toward
a more reasonable tone.
-- Ed Leafe
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
