Ed, > Wrong again. http://leafe.com/archives/showMsg/378550
Again, not one substantive reason for your preference. All of the items you cite in that message have to do with personality and popularity. Why would we care about Limbaugh, and what does one person being perceived as more calculating or believable than the other have to do with being a good president? Trust is earned. Obama just hasn't been around long enough to have earned trust. He hasn't done much of anything at all yet on the national scene. Believability is just a fluffy, feel-good mush-word if the candidate has no earned trust 'bank' to draw on. Your responses sound like you're looking for a cheerleader in chief that the other side won't lob hardballs at. Obama has plenty for the right wing to go after, and surely they'll take every advantage they can find. Frankly, Hillary is better positioned to fight the right wing. Obama has benefited by the Democrats' desire to be PC. The right wing has far fewer sensibilities about those things. Kristyne _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
