Michael-

I submitted my first (and only) SBIR application back in late 2004/early
2005. We were not awarded the grant (but recently found out that the actual
awardee was unable to deliver), but learned a lot in the process. Here are
some thoughts in no particular order:

1. I've heard of companies that actually make a living on these grants,
while the real purpose is for you to "graduate" to building a business
without the need for grants and, more importantly, create jobs. I think the
rules should be tightened to disallow a certain number of repeats, which
favor the organization who understands how to "work" the system.
2. Another problem is that the lead times on preparation are pretty short;
it would be nice to get more time to prepare.
3. I've not done an STTR, but the 30% set aside for an academic institution
(I could have sworn it was more) is problematic, mainly because a good
portion of that 30% goes to "university mandated overhead", leaving a much
smaller useful resource portion coming from the academic partner. 
4. Overall, I think the intellectual property issues are the real minefield
for a lot of companies; different agencies treat SBIR/STTR grants
differently in this regard; caveat emptor.

Dave Bernard
The Intellection Group, Inc.
http://www.IntellectionGroup.com

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael Madigan
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 3:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [NF] Looking for people who have participated in SBIR or STTR
federal research grants

I'm doing research for a slide presentation to make
recommendations for improving SBIR and STTR grants.
<--snip-->



_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to